ChatGPT 4 Developer Claims Potential for Creating Biological Weapons

A report has surfaced regarding OpenAI's artificial intelligence program, ChatGPT 4, suggesting a very slight possibility of it being capable of producing biological weapons. The company has not explicitly denied this news.

In recent times, artificial intelligence has seen extensive development and widespread use globally. It has become a trend that has made waves in various fields, news, and publications. Artificial intelligence has rapidly enhanced capabilities in certain areas, replacing human workers in some fields with a technological alternative capable of autonomous and precise results. However, it is not entirely autonomous as it still requires ongoing development and refinement.

Historically, new technologies, before entering the market, have often been initially earmarked for military purposes. This was the case with many previous technologies that were initially developed for military or scientific research, such as the internet we have today.

According to a Bloomberg report, there are concerns among OpenAI's research teams regarding potential risks associated with ChatGPT 4, a conversational AI application with significantly more information compared to its predecessors. The team suggests the possibility of developing biological weapons using ChatGPT 4.

This report has raised concerns among artificial intelligence researchers, fearing the potential for major security issues on a national and global level if these technologies fall into the wrong hands, including terrorists and criminals. There is also concern about the possibility of contributing to sophisticated cyber attacks using powerful AI tools like ChatGPT 4. However, it's important to clarify that versions of such programs exist with restrictions for military and research purposes, unlike the publicly available versions.

Additionally, statistics suggest that using ChatGPT 4 for research provides more detailed and accurate results compared to general internet searches such as Google. This advantage has made it a preferred tool for researchers, although the margin of superiority is relatively small.

Ongoing research on this powerful application continues to explore its capabilities and its ability to meet user needs. Recently, a menacing version named WormGPT has emerged, claiming to provide dangerous information that could pose significant problems and threats. Users are urged to exercise caution when utilizing such tools. This raises the question of the limitations imposed on users for using these tools. If restrictions are stringent, is there a possibility that someone could access highly dangerous information through these extensive versions?